A Comparison between Two Essays Essay

Paulo Freires essay The Banking Concept of Education and pedestrian Percys essay The Loss of the Creature ultimately sh be the same message that students without a compete are non adequate to(p) to use their education to confront real-life situations. I believe that meaty acquisition is a process that takes place daily. Every single learns in a divergent way and at different speed. I feel that it is a gradual process in which unmatched learns imperceptibly depending on what they watch been suitable to grasp in or from the kind of mistakes do. I would define meaningful learning as a process in which one is exposed to new interesting information, lie withledge or experience that one could use in their upcoming life if needed, and help them from committing any excess blunders related to it. One formulation that can affect meaningful learning are the preconceived notions that are built from numerous different sources it could be media, books, another(prenominal) people, ou tings or from experiences that are driven by their induce pure personal desire. For me, it is meaningful learning if one has used their individual perspective and critical thinking to come to a result and educated them from the information acqui departure.I feel that having predetermined notions is not a terrible thing just it is important that one should be open to other aspects. To shed some light on my design of meaningful learning, I would like to use the example of my visit to Red Fort, India. I went with some preconceived notions since I had perceive a wad about it from my close friend. Percy states in his essay that, the sovereign husking of the thing before him is rather measuring up of the thing to the criterion of the preformed symbolic complex (460). Percy, in the above statement argues that having a preconceived image through media, books or other sources can function to false appreciation. While on the other hand, Freires states that education becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the instructor is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiques and makes deposits, which the students patiently receive, memorize and repeat (318).In the abovestatement, Freire claims that the banking concept of education thereby changes humans into objects. Humans have no independence and therefore no ability to rationalize and create by mental act knowledge at a personal level. Both Percy and Friere claims that any notions built on the basis of additional sources cannot lead to a meaningful experience. As per Percy, I lost sovereignty on my trip to red fortification by having preconceived notions and not thinking critically about it, while as per Friere, I was the depository and my friend was the depositor, which affected my learning of a meaningful experience. From my experience, I dis affiliate with both of them. On my trip, I found that the fort had its wall engraved with clocklines and de tails of how and when various events took place in that fort in the historical era. The fort had old weapons preserved, which the emperor and their soldiers were using in the historical era. I captured a lot of images and videos but was also able to experience the site to the fullest.I spent an entire sidereal day at the fort, which was truly an amazing experience and learnt a lot more about it than what I had heard from my friend. My experience at the Red Fort made me believe that having some preconceived notions can be encouraging and productive in opposition to what Percy thinks about people having symbolic complexity and not able to experience the sight for what it truly is. According to Frieres banking concept, my friend was the depositor and I was depositories, had I not been a depositories in this case, I do not think I would have even visited this place and would have missed out on a meaningful learning experience. From my experience, I do not agree with Percy regarding his view on how to acquire real experience. In such a tech savvy world, it is intimately of the time not practically possible to be unaware about things. I feel that not understanding its significance before jumping to any conclusion can lead one to mortification and loss of sovereignty.Later another incident occurred in my life when I decided to move to the unify States of America, everything was different to me. I had enrolled myself as an international student in college. I was not a facile English speaker as compared to all the students analyse here. I enrolled myself into an English course along with other four different courses. English was not easy to read or grasp the first time through but gradually after few lectures in which there was continuous communication and questions asked during the folk I could comprehend. Communication between students andtheir teachers is the key to learning. I remember before giving assignments, my teacher would release us with background i nformation as to how to begin, how to use key words, make clear sentences and etc. She was a resource for me. She not only gave information on what we were reading but called upon us to formulate an approximation and share it with the class.When the teacher allowed my classmates and me to converse, we could come up with new ideas and shared with her to get her opinion. She would either say that we made an excellent point and that she never thought of it before or might even share a better knowledge with us from her experience about it. This reminds me of Paulo Frieres quote that, Through dialogue, the teacher-of-the-student and the students of the teacher deliver to exist and a new term emerges teacher student with student-teacher. The teacher is no longer the one who teaches you but one who teaches himself in dialogue with the students. They become jointly responsible for a process in which all grow (324). Friere also states that, both should simultaneously be teachers and studen ts. The teacher no longer knows everything and students know nothing (319). The utilization of students and the teachers are not necessarily what need to be altered. From my experience, I agree with Freire that the role of the teacher and the student will always remain however, it is the distance between role and authority of the two, which should change.They are now partners. This example also relates to the story of the Falkland Islander by Walker Percy, who, by himself learnt through his own actions. He took a jack knife and started digging to see for himself and learnt with a different perspective thence that of a biology student who would diagnose as per given instructions. In my case, I was given that exemption to critically think and come up with ideas by different perspectives. I was exercising the sovereign indemnify and was master of my own creation. I could have taken help from my teacher but I believed in myself that I could do it and even when in trouble, my teacher w as there for me as a true focus and subordinate to show me the path. Thus I strongly agree with Walker Percy that, The Falkland Islander explores his dogfish and he is the person exercising the sovereign right of a person in his lordship and mastery of creation(467).I certainly agree with Paulo Frieres problem posing education method and Walker Percys studying method as both has led to a meaningful learning experience in my life. I was not only able to think and decide for myselfbut it also helped me gain a lot of confidence. It made me realize that I might have missed out on certain meaningful learning experience if I had not been given a chance to think by myself. The do-nothing line is that education should provide tools and practice in critical thinking for students, not absolute answers. I completely agree with Freires argument in this chapter. In fact, I feel that it is one of the intimately meaningful pieces of educational literature that I have ever encountered.WORK CITED Frieire, Paulo. The Banking Concept of Education. Ways of Reading. capital of Massachusetts Bedford, 2011. Percy, Walker. The Loss of Creature. Ways of Reading. Boston Bedford, 2011.