The Scope of Woolf’s Feminism in A Room of One’s Own Essay -- Woolf A

The Scope of Woolfs Feminism in A Room of aces OwnMissing Works CitedA highly contested statement on women and fiction, Virginia Woolfs extended evidence A Room of Ones Own has been repeatedly reviewed, critiqued, and analyze sinceits publication in 1929. Arnold Bennett, an early twentieth-century novelist, and DavidDaiches, a literary critic who wrote an abbreviation entitled Virginia Woolf in 1942 (Murphy247), were among those to attempt to extricate the themes and implications of Woolfscomplex essay. The 2 critics deal with the often-discussed feminist aspect of Woolfsessay in interestingly different ways. Bennett states that Woolfs essay is not a feminist compute, rejects the subject that Woolfs discussion of women and fiction may lean towards the political, and reduces the essays reach to a collection of musings on women and fiction.Daiches responds to A Room of Ones Own in the opposite way he claims that Woolfswork is feminist, and Woolfs feminism emphasizes not only wome n and theirrelationship to fiction, precisely all people of genius who have not had an opportunity to apply itbecause of their lack of m 1y and privacy. While Bennett restricts the scope of theessay to a non- feminist, all told apolitical ideology and Daiches enlarges the scope toa wide, universal feminism, Woolfs possess intention in makeup A Room of Ones Own mayhave actually been to create a work that lay somewhere in between these two extremes.In one of the earliest reviews of A Room of Ones Own, British novelist ArnoldBennett intercommunicate the question of feminism in the essay and concluded that Woolf wasnot writing from a feminist perspective. It is a book a little round men and a great dealabout women. But it is no... ...ments do point out important limits on Woolfs feminism. As Arnold Bennett says, Woolfs concerns are not political althoughour modern definition of feminism is wider than Bennetts was, Woolfs lack of politicalinterest does certainly limit the scope o f her feminism. David Daichess critique of theessay points out another important feature film of Woolfs feminist thought. Herfeminism is not, as Daiches believes based in a larger democratic feeling. Woolfsfeminism is in actuality quite particular in tha t she only applies it to British, upper middleclass women writers. Virginia Woolfs essay-which to Bennett seemed non- feminist and to Daiches seemed feminist- universalist-is, by our modern definition, feminist however, the borders of culture, class, and profession that composed her frame of reference drastically limit the scope of Woolfs feminism.