Right to Own an Architecture

Right to own an computer architecture (by Wolfgang Koehler, Meaning, Germany 10/2008) The social bulge I would like to discuss here is Suppose a data processor manufacturer wear outs a new machine architecture. To what extent should the smart set be allowed to own that architecture? What polity would be best for society? To develop a new machine architecture would require many recourses. Manpower, look for laboratories, manufacturing equipment and last but not least a lot of money.Since companies be in business to make money for themselves as well as heir shareholders the answer to the first question to me is clear 100%. in a flash well take a look at the pros and cons of such a policy on different levels of society. Any policy of course give fork out a direct impact on the people that are at a time involved with this attach to. They are the shareholders on one side and the employees on the other. If the company has the slump to own this architecture the value of the co mpanys shares volition go up.Also it will secure the employees workplaces or even add additional Jobs. This perishs us to the nigh level of society to be taken in consideration, the city where this company is located. Not only will it receive more tax gross as the company becomes more profit adequate to(p) it to a fault might be able to attract more qualified people. The growing demand for components also might lead to additional companies opening businesses in town. All of this will create a better economy for the city and the people vivacious there.One might argue that owning a certain technology will lead to a monopoly. The past forever showed that most companies are not able to supply the growing demand for their product and therefore they will permit out the technology to others to capture a bigger portion of the grocery store. At this point the prices for the product will also go down and the architecture will become affordable for more and more people The right of compa nies to own their developments actually leads to further development, because nobody wants to be outdone by the competition.A serious example is the Apple pod as well as the phone. At the beginning Apple was the only company with such products on sale. straight off Just about every major electronics manufacturer has similar or even better products in their portfolio. Since not everybody will have an neighboring(a) need for the product right at the point of its introduction to the market it can be summarized that a policy of 100% owner charge of the architecture has mostly positive impact on the society as such. The few perceived disadvantages are mostly based on wants preferably then needs.